Black Basta Ransomware Campaign Drops Zbot, DarkGate, and Custom Malware

Last updated at Mon, 23 Dec 2024 13:51:10 GMT

Executive Summary

Beginning in early October, Rapid7 has observed a resurgence of activity related to the ongoing social engineering campaign being conducted by Black Basta ransomware operators. Rapid7 initially reported the discovery of the novel social engineering campaign back in May, 2024, followed by an update in August 2024, when the operators updated their tactics and malware payloads and began sending lures via Microsoft Teams. Now, the procedures followed by the threat actors in the early stages of the social engineering attacks have been refined again, with new malware payloads, improved delivery, and increased defense evasion.

Overview

The social engineering attacks are still initiated in a similar manner. Users within the target environment will be email bombed by the threat actor, which is often achieved by signing up the user’s email to numerous mailing lists simultaneously. After the email bomb, the threat actor will reach out to the impacted users. Rapid7 has observed the initial contact still occurs primarily through usage of Microsoft Teams, by which the threat actor, as an external user, will attempt to call or message the impacted user to offer assistance. The account domains in use include both Azure/Entra tenant subdomains (e.g., username[@]tenantsubdomain[.]onmicrosoft[.]com) and custom domains (e.g., username[@]cofincafe[.]com).

In many cases, Rapid7 has observed that the threat actor will pretend to be a member of the target organization’s help desk, support team, or otherwise present themself as IT staff. Below are examples of Microsoft Teams display names observed, by Rapid7, to be in use by operators. The display names may or may not be padded with whitespace characters. Rapid7 has also observed threat actors use a first and last name, as the chat display name and/or account username, to impersonate an IT staff member within the targeted organization.

If the user interacts with the lure, either by answering the call or messaging back, the threat actor will attempt to get the user to install or execute a remote management (RMM) tool, including, but not limited to, QuickAssist, AnyDesk, TeamViewer, Level, or ScreenConnect. Rapid7 has also observed attempts to leverage the OpenSSH client, a native Windows utility, to establish a reverse shell. In at least one instance, the threat actor shared a QR code with the targeted user. The purpose of the QR code is unconfirmed but appears to be an attempt to bypass MFA after stealing a user’s credentials. The URL embedded within the QR code adheres to the following format: hxxps://<company_name>[.]qr-<letter><number>[.]com.

In a majority of cases, Rapid7 has observed that the operator, after gaining access to the user’s asset via RMM tool, will then attempt to download and execute additional malware payloads. In one case handled by Rapid7, the operator requested more time — potentially to hand off the access to another member of the group.

The payload delivery methods vary per case, but have included external compromised SharePoint instances, common file sharing websites, servers rented through hosting providers, or even direct upload to the compromised asset in the case of RMM tool remote control. In one case, the operator used the group’s custom credential harvester to dump the user’s credentials, the results for which were subsequently uploaded to a file sharing site — publicly exposing the stolen credentials. SharePoint has been used to distribute copies of AnyDesk portable, likely to circumvent security measures that would prevent the user from downloading it directly from anydesk[.]com. Such attempts have been blocked by web proxy in previous cases.

The overall goal following initial access appears to be the same: to quickly enumerate the environment and dump the user’s credentials. When possible, operators will also still attempt to steal any available VPN configuration files. With the user’s credentials, organization VPN information, and potential MFA bypass, it may be possible for them to authenticate directly to the target environment.

Rapid7 has observed usage of the same credential harvesting executable, previously reported as AntiSpam.exe, though it is now delivered in the form of a DLL and most commonly executed via rundll32.exe. Whereas before it was an unobfuscated .NET executable, the program is now commonly contained within a compiled 64-bit DLL loader. Rapid7 has analyzed at least one sample that has also been obfuscated using the group’s custom packer. The newest versions of the credential harvester now save output to the file 123.txt in the user’s %TEMP% directory, an update from the previous qwertyuio.txt file, though versions of the DLL distributed earlier in the campaign would still output to the previous file.

The credential harvester is most commonly followed by the execution of a loader such as Zbot (a.k.a. Zloader) or DarkGate. This can then serve as a gateway to the execution of subsequent payloads in memory, facilitate data theft, or otherwise perform malicious actions. Rapid7 has also observed operators distributing alternate payload archives containing Cobalt Strike beacon loaders and a pair of Java payloads containing a user credential harvester variant and a custom multi-threaded beacon by which to remotely execute PowerShell commands. In some cases, operators have sent the user a short command, via Teams, which will then begin an infection chain after execution by the targeted user.

Rapid7 continues to observe inconsistent usage of the group’s custom packer to deliver various malware payloads, including their custom credential harvester. A YARA rule is now publicly available that can be used to detect the packer. For example, this packer was used to deliver several obfuscated versions of Black Basta ransomware, obtained via open source intelligence, which directly links operators to the ongoing social engineering campaign.

At the time of writing, the threat actors behind the campaign continue to update both their strategy for gaining initial access and the tools subsequently used. For example, around the time the most recent campaign activity began, Rapid7 observed the delivery of a timestamped and versioned payload archive, 171024_V1US.zip (2024-10-17, version 1, US), which, when compared to a more recently delivered archive, 171124_V15.zip (2024-11-17, version 15), highlights the rapid iteration being undertaken. Many of the payloads being delivered follow a similar pattern as previous activity and often consist of a legitimate file where an export or function entry point has been overwritten to jump to malicious code, and the result is signed with a likely stolen code signing certificate.

Intrusions related to the campaign should be taken seriously — the intent goes beyond typical phishing activity. Past campaign activity has led to the deployment of Black Basta ransomware. While Rapid7 has handled a high volume of incidents related to the current social engineering campaign across a variety of customer environments, to date, every case has been contained before the operator was able to move laterally beyond the targeted user’s asset.

Technical Analysis

Initial Access

Each attack is preceded by the targeted user receiving an often overwhelming amount of emails. An operator will then attempt to contact the user via Microsoft Teams, either via messaging or calling, by which they will pretend to offer assistance. Operators will attempt to impersonate the organization’s help desk, such as using the names of existing staff members.

During this social engineering stage, operators often need to troubleshoot with the user to establish remote control of the user’s asset. Based on the environment, for example, RMM tool downloads or execution may be blocked (often some, but not all) or QuickAssist may be disabled, causing the operator to cycle through their options at establishing a foothold. One of the most common first steps after gaining either the confidence of the user, or remote access, is to execute a custom credential harvester.

Credential Harvesting

The credential harvester used by operators, for example SafeStore.dll (SHA256: 3B7E06F1CCAA207DC331AFD6F91E284FEC4B826C3C427DFFD0432FDC48D55176), is an updated version of the previously analyzed program AntiSpam.exe. The DLL variant of the credential harvester is executed by a command like the following example:

rundll32.exe SafeStore.dll,epaas_request_clone

The module will quickly execute three enumeration commands to gather system information — systeminfo, route print, ipconfig /all — and then prompt the user for their password. The user’s credentials are appended onto a new line of the text file 123.txt with each attempt, after the enumeration command output, regardless of whether the credentials are correct. If the user enters the wrong password, they will be prompted to try again. The output for the enumeration commands and the user’s credentials were saved to the file qwertyuio.txt in older versions of the harvester, but are now saved to 123.txt, within the user’s %TEMP% directory. The enumeration commands within the updated version are executed via successive calls to CreateProcessA.

Based on analysis of one credential harvester sample, EventCloud.dll, the program was present in shellcode form. The shellcode is decrypted from the Cursor Group 880 resource embedded within the executable, using the XOR key 5A 3C 77 6E 33 30 4D 38 4F 38 40 78 41 58 51 30 42 5F 3F 67 71 00, and then injected locally. The following strings which were extracted from the shellcode show the output file and list dynamically loaded libraries:

The Java variant of the credential harvester, identity.jar, provides a similar prompt to the user, though when a password is entered it is appended, without the username, to a .txt file with a random 10-letter alphabetic name to the current working directory. The cancel button on the prompt, shown below, is not functional and the prompt is drawn on top of other windows, meaning that it will not close until the user has entered their password correctly.

Malware Payloads

Following execution of a credential harvester, an operator will typically infect the asset with Zbot or DarkGate. One of the Zbot samples delivered after initial access, SyncSuite.exe (SHA256: DB34E255AA4D9F4E54461571469B9DD53E49FEED3D238B6CFB49082DE0AFB1E4) contains similar functionality and strings to other Zbot/Zloader samples previously reported by ZScaler. However, in addition to previously observed strings, the sample also contains encrypted strings for an embedded command help menu, error messages, and more. Rapid7 observed the embedded malware version was 2.9.4.0.

Upon execution, the malware will copy itself to a random folder within the %APPDATA% directory. If the file does not have its original filename however, the process will immediately exit. The malware also contains the functionality to establish persistence either via a Run key at HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run or a scheduled task named after the executable, which executes the malware copy in %APPDATA% whenever the user logs on. After collecting the hostname, username, and the installation date from the InstallDate value contained within the registry key HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion, this data is concatenated (delimited by underscore characters) and encrypted, along with other config information. It is then stored within the user’s registry inside a random key created at HKCU\Software\Microsoft\. The analyzed sample will also load a fresh copy of ntdll.dll to avoid hooking, which is then used to perform calls to NTAPI functions. SyncSuite.exe ultimately injects itself into a suspended instance of msedge.exe, created using NtCreateUserProcess and executed via ResumeThread, a technique known as Process Hollowing.

All of the strings used by the malware are stored encrypted within the .rdata section along with the configuration. The strings are decrypted using an obfuscated loop that is ultimately a simple XOR operation with the hard coded key 16 EB D5 3E AA E6 51 09 14 D3 DF 18 AD D6 1B BD BE, which is also stored in the .rdata section. The configuration is decrypted using an RC4 key, F3 F9 F7 FB FA F3 F7 F7 FF F5 F2 F3 FA FD FE F2 for this sample. The decrypted configuration for SyncSuite.exe can be seen below, with empty rows removed. The configuration contains a different public RSA key and botnet ID than the one previously shared by ThreatLabz, indicating that the campaign is being run by a different affiliate. All decrypted strings from SyncSuite.exe can be seen in the Zbot Strings section following other Indicators of Compromise.

Rapid7 has also observed the delivery of DarkGate malware following initial access. One payload archive contained both a DarkGate infection initiation script, test.vbs, and an executable copy of the DarkGate malware itself, SafeFilter.exe (SHA256: EF28A572CDA7319047FBC918D60F71C124A038CD18A02000C7AB413677C5C161 ), though this copy is packed using the group’s custom packer. The final payload containing the DarkGate malware, after several layers of decrypting and loading, contains the version string 7.0.6. If the folder c:\debugg exists on the system when the malware is executed it will display the version number via MessageBoxA. The configuration for this sample can be seen below along with hard coded commands. Notably, the campaign ID for the sample appears to be drk2.

The configuration is decrypted with the key ckcilIcconnh within a customized XOR loop near the beginning of execution to reveal CRLF delimited options. However, due to the implementation of the decryption loop, the keyspace is effectively reduced to that of a single byte (0-255), after the first byte. This makes the XOR key for the majority of the config 0x60, for this sample allowing for the encrypted data to be trivially bruteforced.

During execution, DarkGate will hash certain strings and use the result to create or check files at the directories C:\ProgramData\hedfdfd(mainfolder) and C:\temp\. The hashing algorithm uses a randomized key generated at runtime, so the hashes across infections will be different. Commonly used strings and their resultant hash, for the analysis environment, are shown below.

DarkGate may also change its behavior if a known security product is detected. This is achieved by using CreateToolhelp32Snapshot and related functions to loop through running processes which are compared to a hard-coded list. The malware will also check for known installation directories using GetFileAttributesA. If a security product is found, a flag will be set which may alter the execution path. Only the following products had associated flags:

At the end of the first execution of the DarkGate payload, it will then attempt to inject itself into a host process. First, DarkGate will select the injection target by searching a list of hard coded directories for any executable that contains the string updatecore.exe, subdirectories included. The path C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft\EdgeUpdate\ is searched first, with the fallback being C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft\EdgeUpdate\MicrosoftEdgeUpdate.exe. If a matching Edge executable is not found, the path C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Update\ is then searched. If that also fails, the malware will attempt to use C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\msbuild.exe.

After successfully choosing the injection target, DarkGate will then inject itself into the target process using shellcode, terminating the original instance of the final DarkGate payload after executing the shellcode. When creating an instance of the target process to inject, DarkGate will also attempt to spoof the parent process ID (PPID) of the injection target by enumerating running processes for accessibility using OpenProcess and then randomly selecting one from an assembled list. The PPID of the target is then updated using UpdateProcThreadAttribute prior to creation with CreateProcessA.

Execution of the injected process is coordinated by checking for the presence of two file based mutexes within C:\ProgramData\hedfdfd\ (mainfolder). Each instance of the DarkGate malware checks both of the file-based mutexes. The file mutex usage is checked via calls to CreateFileA using an exclusive share mode flag (0) and a creation disposition of CREATE_ALWAYS, which means that if the mutex is already in usage by another DarkGate instance the call will fail. If the call to both mutexes created by DarkGate, hfgdced and cekchde, fails, DarkGate will exit. As a result of having two mutexes, DarkGate will typically run within two injected process instances at the same time, so if one process is terminated, the remaining instance will spawn another. If a DarkGate instance is spawned and both calls to open the file based mutexes fail, indicating two existing DarkGate instances, the new instance will terminate. This technique is rarely used by malware developers and highlights the sophistication of DarkGate malware.

DarkGate will unconditionally log keystrokes as well as clipboard data that is under 1024 bytes. The logged data is stored encrypted at C:\ProgramData\hedfdfd\fhhcfhh (mainfolder\logsfolder) within files named <date>.log. The logged data may be sent directly to the C2 address contained within the config. A thread is also created to persist on infected systems by creating the Run key daaadeh (script) at HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run. The Run key will point to the copies of Autoit3.exe and the compiled AU3 script payload dgfeabe.a3x (au3) created at C:\ProgramData\hedfdfd (mainfolder), with the former executing the latter every time the user logs on. When the AU3 script is executed, DarkGate reinfects the system. The thread continuously monitors the text within the infected user’s active window however, sleeping 1500ms between checks, and will delete the registry key if a blacklisted application is detected. This list includes popular analysis tools such as Process Hacker, Process Monitor, Task Manager, and even the Windows Registry Editor.

The DarkGate sample executed by SafeFilter.exe contains 78 remote commands, some of which can be seen below with their intended function. Every loop, the malware will re-send the text of the active window, user idle time, and whether or not the malware instance has admin rights, before checking for a command.

Mitigation Guidance

Rapid7 recommends taking the following precautions to limit exposure to these types of attacks:

• Restrict the ability for external users to contact users via Microsoft Teams to the greatest extent possible. This can be done for example by blocking all external domains or creating a white/black list. Microsoft Teams will allow all external requests by default. For more information, see this reference.
• Standardize remote management tools within the environment. For unapproved tools, block known hashes and domains to prevent usage. Hash blocking can be done, for example, via Windows AppLocker or an endpoint protection solution.
• Provide user awareness training regarding the social engineering campaign. Familiarize users with official help desk and support procedures to enable them to spot and report suspicious requests.
• Standardize VPN access. Traffic from known low cost VPN solutions should be blocked at a firewall level if there is no business use case.

Rapid7 Customers

InsightIDR, Managed Detection and Response, and Managed Threat Complete customers have existing detection coverage through Rapid7's expansive library of detection rules. Rapid7 recommends installing the Insight agent on all applicable hosts to ensure visibility into suspicious processes and proper detection coverage. Below is a non-exhaustive list of detections that are deployed and will alert on behavior related to this activity:

MITRE ATT&CK Techniques

Indicators of Compromise

Indicators of compromise are available here.